Friday, February 26, 2010
Majoring in the Major Theme: The Gospel
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Acts 23- The Lord is Near
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Wrecked by Persecution
On The Desk
Acts 23- Fulfilling Our Duty
Friday, February 19, 2010
Reminder to Be Missional
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Acts 22- Testimony
Criticism pt. 2
Criticism
"In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so."
Friday, February 12, 2010
Making Sense of Hebrews 6:4-6
1)Its a threat. The idea behind this argument is that the author wants to shock the readers into persevering. I don't buy it. I had a teacher in high school that threw around threats but never ever followed through. We ruled that class and she [the teacher] was our puppet. In the same way a parent that never follows through on a threat doesn't actually make their kids behave by threatening them. I don't think God works like that either. As if He says, "If you turn from me I will NEVER GIVE YOU REPENTANCE!" then under His breath, "not really, I don't do that." So that argument doesn't work for me. Another argument is...
2) It is a manner of speaking (vs. 9)
This argument means that the Author is proving a point argumentum ad absurdum (R.C. Sproul says it this way, I am not that smart!). Meaning, let's follow out this line of thought and see where it takes us, the end result is absurd. The bible does this in other places too like 1 Cor 15. This is where Paul writes about if you think there really was no resurrection, what are the implications? You are still in sin, you are still dead, you have no hope of resurrection, basically the end result is absurd. So, with Hebrews, what may be happening is he is playing out the premise 'let us go back to Jewish practices'. The way this would role out is: If you leave the gospel to go back to Jewish practices then you are saying the cross is useless, Jewish religion is king, there is no hope of repentance because you already dismissed Jesus, he is not coming again to be crucified again... therefore,there is no hope for you. (Something like that) The way this could happen today is somebody experiences Christianity, gets 'saved,' then turns away from the gospel to something else. Let's say that something else could be social justice, missions trips, church growth, etc... (religion). So, you have moved away from the cross and the end result is an absurd reality. None of those causes can save just like the religion of the Jews void of Jesus cannot save. 'However, in your case we are confident of better things.' So really this argument is saying, don't graduate from the gospel because that is absurd as if there is something better than Jesus. A third argument is...
3) Mixed corpus. The church is made up of a mixed bunch of people. Some are authentic Christians and some are false, professing christians. So, this is actually saying you might be a professing christian that actually turns away from God because you were never really saved in the first place. This gains steam from Matthew 7:21, "not everyone who says Lord, Lord will enter the kingdom," and 1 John 2:19, "They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they belonged to us they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us." So Hebrews is saying to someone who thinks they are saved (but doesn't know that they aren't) they will continue in their lost-ness. But, I would ask, 'why such strong language for false professors' because we know that God can grant repentance in the 11th hour. I do not think it is impossible for someone to repent when they never actually did in the first place. I would say very passionately, 'it is totally possible!' So, this argument also does not satisfy me.
But, it gets even more complicated, why does Peter get repentance? Then, why doesn't Judas? Why does God tell Nathan to stop praying for Saul? It is hard to know the mind of God!
4) It is referring to someone who willfully and determinedly turns from Christ and hardens their heart to the things of God. This is the view that seems to make the most sense to me. And, it seems that the impossibility of 'being brought back to repentance' rests in the nature of sin, not necessarily the judicial sentence of God (if it is even possible to separate the two?).
"Sin will grow a light thing to thee; thou wilt pass it by as a thing of nought; this it will grow to. And what will be the end of such a condition? Can a sadder thing befall thee? Is it not enough to make any heart to tremble, to think of being brought into that estate wherein he should have slight thoughts of sin? Slight thoughts of grace, of mercy, of the blood of Christ, of the law, heaven, and hell, come all in at the same season. Take heed, this is that thy lust is working towards, -- the hardening of the heart, searing of the conscience, blinding of the mind, stupifying of the affections, and deceiving of the whole soul."Could anything be MORE terrifying than the hardening of heart that leads to 'deceiving the whole soul,' and results in eternal damnation?
I don't totally understand the contours of Hebrews 6, but I think the way we respond to this text needs to be the same no matter the argument. "So if you think you stand, be careful that you don't fall." (1 Corinthians 10:4) Then again, "We want you to show diligence to the very end in order to make your hope sure" (Hebrews 6:11). Do not assume that you are in the same case as Peter, who was able to be restored. It is a strong reminder not to bank on being granted repentance later... Nobody should hope that they can live wild then return later in life. There are certain cases where repentance doesn't happen. People fall away from God never to return... how are we to know which case is which? So don't turn from Him because you may end up like Esau. Keep following Jesus and never give up. Don't let sin harden your heart. "Be diligent to the very end, in order to make your hope sure" (Hebrews 6:11) We have a certain hope: "We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain, where Jesus, who went before us, has entered on our behalf" (Hebrews 6:19,20). Our hope is bound up in the priestly work of Jesus Christ, who is currently in heaven before the throne on our behalf. Amen.
Staff Directory
Emase
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Disciplines of Grace by Bridges
Disciplines of Grace by Jerry Bridges
This is the second book that I have read by Bridges, the first being Pursuit of Holiness. He is quickly climbing my list of favorite authors. I was completely blown away by the depth of this man's understanding of the gospel. There are very few books that have rocked me to the extent that this book did and does. Simply put, this is one of the better books that I have read in a while. Bridges is very concise and readable. He doesn't waste a lot of ink with big words or confusing arguments. The book is crystal clear in its application of the gospel: “your worst days are never so bad that you are beyond the reach of God’s grace. And your best days are never so good that you are beyond the needof God’s grace.” There isn't a page in my copy without some sort of underlining or writing in the margins. As great as the authors of old are, Bridges (in my opinion) eclipses them because of his accessibility. A jr high student could pick up a copy and understand while a seminary professor could also benefit from reading this. Bridges is the perfect wedding of deep deep theological truths with readability. Well done.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Acts 21- Bound by Belt
After we had been there a number of days, a prophet named Agabus came down from Judea. Coming over to us, he took Paul's belt, tied his own hands and feat with it and said, "The Holy Spirit says, 'In this way the Jews of Jerusalem will bind the owner of this belt and will hand him over to the Gentiles.'" When we heard this, we and the people there pleaded with Paul not to go up to Jerusalem. Then Paul answered, "Why are you weeping and breaking my heart? I am ready not only to be bound, but also to die in Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 21:10-13).